
How to write a business plan: sections, financials and mistakes
How to write a business plan step by step: traditional vs lean formats, what goes in each section, how to build financial projections, and mistakes to avoid.
Business & Strategy · Explainer
Porter's five forces explained: what each force measures, a worked airline industry example, the model's limits, and how it fits with SWOT and PESTEL.

Key takeaways
Porter’s five forces is a framework for judging how profitable an industry is likely to be, by looking at the pressures that push prices down and costs up. Introduced by Harvard Business School professor Michael Porter in a 1979 Harvard Business Review article, it remains one of the most widely taught tools in business strategy. The core insight is simple: competition for profits comes not only from direct rivals but also from customers, suppliers, potential entrants and substitute products.
Some industries earn high returns year after year while others struggle no matter how well they are managed. Porter’s argument is that the difference comes mainly from industry structure, meaning the underlying economic and technical features that shape how value gets divided. A company can be brilliantly run and still earn thin margins if it sits in a structurally tough industry.
The Institute for Strategy and Competitiveness at Harvard Business School puts it this way: the five forces determine an industry’s average profitability, and understanding them is the starting point for positioning a company within it. That is why the framework belongs at the business-unit level of corporate strategy: it tells you where profits are available before you decide how to compete for them.
New competitors bring fresh capacity and a desire to win market share, which pushes prices down and costs up. What matters is not how many companies actually enter but how credible the threat is. That depends on barriers to entry, the obstacles a newcomer must overcome. Common barriers include economies of scale, high capital requirements, strong brands and customer loyalty, switching costs, access to distribution channels, patents and government licensing.
Powerful suppliers capture more value for themselves by charging higher prices, limiting quality or shifting costs onto their customers. Supplier power is high when a few suppliers dominate, when their product is essential and hard to replace, when switching suppliers is costly, or when the supplier could plausibly enter the buyer’s industry itself. Labor counts as a supplier too, so a highly skilled or unionized workforce can be a powerful force.
The mirror image of supplier power. Powerful customers force prices down, demand better quality or more service, and play suppliers off against each other. Buyers have leverage when they are few and large relative to sellers, when products are standardized, when switching costs are low, and when buyers are price-sensitive because the purchase is a big share of their own costs.
A substitute performs the same or a similar function by a different means. Video calls substitute for business travel; a home espresso machine substitutes for a café. Substitutes put a ceiling on prices: if an industry charges too much, customers switch. The threat is greatest when the substitute offers an attractive price-performance trade-off and switching is easy. Substitutes are easy to overlook because they often come from outside the industry.
Rivalry shows up as price cuts, new product launches, advertising campaigns and service improvements. It is most damaging when it turns into price competition, because that transfers profit directly to customers. Rivalry tends to be intense when there are many competitors of similar size, industry growth is slow, products are hard to tell apart, exit barriers are high and fixed costs push companies to fill capacity at almost any price.
Porter’s 2008 article is clear that several things people often add to the list are better understood as factors that work through the five forces. Industry growth rate is one: fast growth can ease rivalry for a while, but it says nothing about whether suppliers or buyers will capture the gains. Technology and innovation are another, since a new technology matters only insofar as it lowers entry barriers, creates substitutes or shifts bargaining power. The same goes for government regulation and complementary products, goods or services used alongside an industry’s own, such as software for computers. Treating these as separate forces risks double-counting; asking how each one changes the five forces keeps the analysis sharp.
Airlines are a textbook case, and Porter himself uses the industry as an example of structural difficulty in his 2008 update. Here is a simplified, general assessment:
| Force | Strength | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Threat of new entrants | Medium | Aircraft can be leased, but airport slots, regulation and scale are real barriers |
| Supplier power | High | Few large aircraft and engine makers; powerful unions; airports with local monopolies |
| Buyer power | High | Fare comparison is easy online, many travelers are price-sensitive, switching costs are low |
| Threat of substitutes | Medium | Trains, cars and video calls replace some trips, especially short ones |
| Rivalry | High | High fixed costs, perishable seats and similar products encourage fare wars |
The picture explains why airlines can carry millions of passengers and still struggle to earn returns above their cost of capital over long periods. Value leaks to aircraft makers, airports, labor, and price-sensitive customers. The forces also suggest where airlines try to fight back: loyalty programs raise switching costs, alliances and consolidation reduce rivalry, and fees for extras let carriers advertise low fares while recovering revenue.
Contrast that with an industry where entry is hard, buyers are fragmented and substitutes are weak. Profits there tend to be higher and steadier, even for average competitors.
The SBA’s guide to market research and competitive analysis offers practical ways to gather the underlying information, and the results feed directly into the market analysis section of a business plan.
The framework is powerful, but it has well-known weak spots:
Five forces works best as one tool among several:
A sensible sequence is PESTEL for the big picture, five forces for the industry, then SWOT and value chain analysis for the company.
Porter’s five forces explains why profitability differs so much between industries: the more power entrants, suppliers, buyers, substitutes and rivals have, the less value is left for the companies in the middle. Use it to understand where profits come from and where they leak, then pair it with company-level tools to decide how to compete. For more strategy explainers, browse our Business & Strategy hub.
Michael E. Porter, a professor at Harvard Business School, introduced the framework in his 1979 Harvard Business Review article How Competitive Forces Shape Strategy. He developed it further in his 1980 book Competitive Strategy and revisited it in a 2008 Harvard Business Review article, The Five Competitive Forces That Shape Strategy, which addresses common misunderstandings of the model.
Porter argues it is not. In his 2008 update he says government policy matters through its effect on the five forces, for example when regulation raises barriers to entry or when price controls limit buyer power, rather than as a separate force. Some analysts add government or complementary products as a sixth factor, but that is an adaptation, not part of the original framework.
Yes, as long as you define the industry carefully. A neighborhood bakery competes in a local market, so the relevant rivals, buyers and substitutes are local too. Working through the forces helps a small business owner see where profits could be squeezed, such as by a powerful landlord or a supermarket selling cheap bread, and is a useful input to a business plan.
Five forces analyzes the structure of an industry, which is the same for every company in it. SWOT looks at one company's internal strengths and weaknesses and the external opportunities and threats it faces. Many strategists use five forces first to understand the industry, then feed the findings into the opportunities and threats part of a SWOT.
First published . Spotted an error? Read our editorial policy and tell us.
Contact RedAndWhiteMagz.com
Spotted a market shift, a company worth profiling, a scam making the rounds or a mistake in one of our articles? Tell us. We read every message and reply as quickly as we can.
